I know how frustrating it must be. You’ve had a casting for
a show. You learnt everything you were meant too, had a nice chat with the
director and casting director – and thought you left with a ‘good vibe’. But
two weeks after your audition you haven’t heard a thing. Frustrating. Particularly
if you’ve had five recalls and a final. In this kind of situation you’ve
already invested a lot into the audition process – time, money, and energy. Not
to mention the sleepless nights, days taken off work, even paying to watch the
show. So it’s only natural to feel you’ve got the part. So why is it that we
often don’t give you, the actor, an answer? Whether it be a ‘yes’, ‘no’, or
‘we’re still not sure’ - at least it
would let you know where you stand, and allow you to move on if the job doesn’t
go your way.
I recently spent a boozy Dom-filled evening discussing this
with some dear actor friends, who said they find it frustrating and rude when
we don’t give answers – particularly when they’ve had a couple of recalls and
dance calls. In any other job after an interview, or even after an application
you would usually get an answer – so why doesn’t this happen in showbusiness? It used
to be because of time – if we’d seen over 100 people then it would take forever
to let everyone know why they didn’t get the job - but times have changed.
Theatre, in particular, has always been steeped in tradition, and some people
resent changing with the times – but now we live in an age where it takes
seconds to send an email. For casting directors to send a standard email
stating the result of an actor’s audition takes no time at all.
We often say that an actor is still ‘in the mix’ - which means they’re not our first choice,
but there’s a chance we might come back to them if everyone else turns us down.
Now this is not a bad thing – indeed it means you’re still in the running – but
maybe we should be even more honest. Often when you don’t hear something for weeks
then that’s the reason – you simply won’t be told until the other actor gives
us an answer. But maybe, instead of not
letting you know what’s going on, we should be honest straight away and tell
you that we’ve offered it to someone else - and if they turn it down then the
part is yours. Then you’d know how highly we thought of you – and there’s still
a chance the job is yours. Is that something that would be better than just a
yes or no? I’d be interested to know your thoughts.
Auditions are very complicated jigsaws, particularly in a
cast change – when it’s not just about casting the parts, but also their covers
and swings. It is a difficult task – and can drag on for months. If it’s for a
long running musical the difficulty comes when actors who are in the current
cast don’t decide if they’re staying on until the last minute - because we will
inevitably have already started auditioning for their part. Now of course this
is annoying if you’re the actor auditioning – because you’re actually
auditioning for a job that possibly doesn’t exist. But with the rising costs of
casting venues we have to see as many people as possible on an audition day. Again
– this is another example of where we could be more honest to the actor. If we
are auditioning actors for a role that actually might not be available we
should make that clear from the offset, so the auditioning actor knows exactly
where they stand. This, I feel, is only fair. Then we aren’t getting anyone
into the room under false pretences. It’s just like if a business advertised a
job and took interviews, and the job wasn’t available – it is actually entirely
illegal. The same applies if we’re not sure about whether to give you the role
or not – we should be honest with your agent and let you know that’s what we’re
thinking.
Then comes the question of if we should give you an answer
on the same day - just after your audition. Often someone is outside the door
letting people in, and it wouldn’t take any time at all for them to pop into
the audition room and relay an answer to you. But I suppose that can be quite
difficult –particularly if you thought you had a good audition. The alternative
is that the casting department could do a standard email after the auditions to
let your agent know (indeed some casting directors sit in auditions dribbling
over porn on their laptop – instead of doing this they could use their laptop
to email your agent, dear).
A couple of actors told me they’d be happy to be told in
their audition if it’s a ‘no’ - straight after they’ve performed their material.
Personally I think that could be quite hard and upsetting - for both the
auditionee and panel. In an audition situation the actors are vulnerable enough
– without the threat of them being told by the director that they’re not right
for the part. It’s most important that we let you perform, and then have a few
minutes to talk amongst ourselves. But I
do feel it’s vital that you’re told as soon as possible. So the solution may be
that your agent is contacted the same evening with an answer - or if you want
to know directly you could leave your mobile number or email address and we will
contact you (however there are some directors and casting directors who you
should NEVER give your number too, dear). Then we could message you an answer
as soon as we get chance.
And while we're on the subject - i have heard horror stories of the words 'you've been pencilled' or 'you've got a heavy pencil' for an advert. Now whoever invented this term (it was probably an advertising exec who got paid 5k for coming up with it) should be pencilled heavily in the face. The term means nothing. Absolutely nothing. Advert casting directors should stop using it entirely - it is like they're dangling a lovely little cheque in front of the actor's nose - only to inevitably take it away with the words 'we've gone in another direction'. If you think there's a chance you may 'go in another direction' then don't call the agent in the first place. It is cruel and makes the actor so excited about the job - which is usually taken away from them a few days later. So please cease from using any term with the word 'pencil' in it - and just call the agent and be honest about the situation the actor is in - for example: 'we like her, but we've got to let the client see the video first. But we also like 2 others. So it could go to any of them'. That would be far fairer, and far clearer, and would not involve using a heavy pencil with a rubber on the end to erase the 'possible booking' from an actors' diary, dear.
And while we're on the subject - i have heard horror stories of the words 'you've been pencilled' or 'you've got a heavy pencil' for an advert. Now whoever invented this term (it was probably an advertising exec who got paid 5k for coming up with it) should be pencilled heavily in the face. The term means nothing. Absolutely nothing. Advert casting directors should stop using it entirely - it is like they're dangling a lovely little cheque in front of the actor's nose - only to inevitably take it away with the words 'we've gone in another direction'. If you think there's a chance you may 'go in another direction' then don't call the agent in the first place. It is cruel and makes the actor so excited about the job - which is usually taken away from them a few days later. So please cease from using any term with the word 'pencil' in it - and just call the agent and be honest about the situation the actor is in - for example: 'we like her, but we've got to let the client see the video first. But we also like 2 others. So it could go to any of them'. That would be far fairer, and far clearer, and would not involve using a heavy pencil with a rubber on the end to erase the 'possible booking' from an actors' diary, dear.
Many actors like feedback after an audition. This can be
rather difficult as often casting directors see so many people that they forget
why they thought you weren’t right. And also, it can just be a ‘feeling’ –
sometimes there’s no reason at all why you’re not suitable for the role, apart
from the fact that you’re simply not ‘quite right’. I know how frustrating that
may sound – but it’s the truth. And
besides, you should never really believe everything you hear when asking for
feedback. I have known agents asking for feedback about their clients, and the
new intern in the casting director’s office has had to read some scruffy
handwriting on the audition sheet – which is interpreted totally wrong. So
unless it comes directly from the casting director themselves take feedback
with a pinch of salt. And even then, casting directors have been known to say
anything just to get an agent off the phone (of course if the feedback is
marvellous then accept it regardless of who it comes from, dear).
Because of social media now it is very easy for actors’ to
do detective work and find out if someone else got the role they wanted. And of
course it’s such a small world that actors know actors – and report of other
people getting the role. So it seems silly not to let the actors know from the
horse’s mouth. And it’s only polite. An actor has given their time to come and
audition for us – and we should show the same courtesy by giving an answer.
Indeed I know one actress who has been waiting for 6 years
to find out if she’s been offered the Evita tour (and the tour finished two
years ago…)!
My actor friends all said it would make them feel much more
valued if we just let them know either way. So the time is now to break this
inconsiderate and unprofessional pattern. If an actor auditions for a show, no
matter how many recalls they have, they deserve an answer. It’s as simple and
easy as that, dear.